Leopard Slips to October. The Sky is Falling!
No, no it isn't. Honestly, the slip to October isn't surprising and it's not a big deal, or any kind of embarrassment. Please, comparing Apple's 4 month delay to the (conservative) 2+ year slip of Vista, like John Markoff of the New York Times, did is a joke.
Leopard, even by Apple's publicly available list, has a lot going on under the hood that needs to be done right. Apple, with this delay, isn't throwing out new features like MSFT did when Vista was slipping *cough* WinFS *cough* so honestly I see the release date move as more about quality.
Was the slippage also caused by development of the iPhone? Daniel over at Red Sweater seems to worry about that. While it wouldn't surprise me if some developers were moved from Mac OS X to iPhone OS X, I wonder if blaming the slip on the iPhone was more of a marketing idea than an actual fact. I guess it remains to be seen how well Apple handles development on the many fronts it has now opened up (Mac, iPhone, AppleTV, iPod) and if there really are staffing problems. (I do think that Daniel's musings about Apple's desire to concentrate everything in Cupertino hurting them is right on. I'd love to see an Apple Development East in, say, the greater Boston area).
One thing this "slip" does certainly do is make all of the analyst/rumor mongers look like idiots, especially the ones claiming a March release date. It also makes WWDC a lot more important, I think, which has me questioning whether or not I should try harder to attend now. More than likely, that's where all of these "secret" features will be unveiled.
The delay also pushes back planned "Leopard-only" releases, which is probably either a blessing or a curse I guess, and probably pushes back a lot of people's decisions to buy a new Mac, which could hurt Apple's sales near-term.
The end of the world, or the end of Apple however, it is not.
Leopard, even by Apple's publicly available list, has a lot going on under the hood that needs to be done right. Apple, with this delay, isn't throwing out new features like MSFT did when Vista was slipping *cough* WinFS *cough* so honestly I see the release date move as more about quality.
Was the slippage also caused by development of the iPhone? Daniel over at Red Sweater seems to worry about that. While it wouldn't surprise me if some developers were moved from Mac OS X to iPhone OS X, I wonder if blaming the slip on the iPhone was more of a marketing idea than an actual fact. I guess it remains to be seen how well Apple handles development on the many fronts it has now opened up (Mac, iPhone, AppleTV, iPod) and if there really are staffing problems. (I do think that Daniel's musings about Apple's desire to concentrate everything in Cupertino hurting them is right on. I'd love to see an Apple Development East in, say, the greater Boston area).
One thing this "slip" does certainly do is make all of the analyst/rumor mongers look like idiots, especially the ones claiming a March release date. It also makes WWDC a lot more important, I think, which has me questioning whether or not I should try harder to attend now. More than likely, that's where all of these "secret" features will be unveiled.
The delay also pushes back planned "Leopard-only" releases, which is probably either a blessing or a curse I guess, and probably pushes back a lot of people's decisions to buy a new Mac, which could hurt Apple's sales near-term.
The end of the world, or the end of Apple however, it is not.
Labels: Mac Musings
2 Comments:
Apple, with this delay, isn't throwing out new features like MSFT did when Vista was slipping *cough* WinFS *cough* so honestly I see the release date move as more about quality.
To be fair to MSFT, they also announced a ton more new features than Apple has so far. To be completely frank, from the non-NDA information available, the jump from Tiger to Leopard is much smaller than from XP to Vista. (Though some of this is due Apple's more frequent releases.)
The big question in my mind is how many of the "Top Secret!" features in Leopard are meeting fates similar to WinFS? There's no way that I have an answer to that (or can get one without doing anything illegal). This is savvy on Apple's part, but if October rolls around and we have the current set of announced Leopard features plus a handful of things on par with PhotoBooth, I'm going to be really disappointed.
I do think that Daniel's musings about Apple's desire to concentrate everything in Cupertino hurting them is right on.
On the other hand, it's much more convenient if the person you need to talk to is just a couple houses over, or you share the same cafeteria. You can just meet up and talk about things in person. E-Mail and even telephone/voice chat only go so far. Sometimes you just need to be able to make frantic gestures to bring across a point.
I'd love to see an Apple Development East in, say, the greater Boston area
I'd prefer even farther east, like, say, Heidelberg, Munich or Berlin ;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home